indefeasible

The Tennessee state constitution opened with the declaration that the people possess ‘at all times, an inalienable and 'indefeasible' right to alter, reform, or abolish the government in such manner as they may think proper.’

In particular, can a person who receives an 'indefeasible' title to property be guilty of theft of that property?

We know what it is like to assert that the right to sovereignty, independence and unity is inalienable and 'indefeasible' .

The lessee obtained, upon registration, an 'indefeasible' title as such.

Can they assume that the title is 'indefeasible' and that they will not be disturbed at some date in the future by someone else claiming the estate?

Any future interest that takes effect in possession or enjoyment after the termination of the estate or interest disclaimed takes effect as if the disclaimant had died before the event determining that the taker of the property or interest had become finally ascertained and the taker's interest is 'indefeasibly' vested.

It is erroneous to regard 'indefeasibility' as relating to an interest which merely confers rights in or over the land of another registered proprietor whose title is indefeasible.

The sceptic's claim that knowledge is impossible could mean that no belief is ever 'indefeasibly' justified.

If there is no challenge as to title then, of course, the shield of 'indefeasibility' protects the registered proprietor.

In the context of inquiry at play in the Meditations, Descartes insists on 'indefeasibility' .

In regard to future interest the reference is to the event which determines that the taker of the property or interest is finally ascertained and his interest is 'indefeasibly' vested.

If an interest existed on May 22, 1965, it may be disclaimed under this section if it had not then become 'indefeasibly' fixed both in quality and quantity or if its taker had not then become finally ascertained.

Of course, from a mortgagee's point of view, this makes 'indefeasibility' of little value.

Rose has a life estate, and Barbara has an 'indefeasibly' vested remainder.

It would itself achieve 'indefeasibility' of title.